I wrote this almost exactly a year ago. It's one of the posts I had the most fun writing, and recently reread it for the first time in a while. Most of the preferences haven't changed (particularly in the miscellaneous section), but a few other things have changed quite a bit. So I'm going to write a slightly updated version.

The main things I'd remove from the first version are:

The rest is largely unchanged, but there are quite a few things I want to add. Without any explicit ordering or categorisation, they are as follows:

To things I don't like the main thing I'd add is French mathematics.

Just like last time, writing this reveals more than I expect.

*For some reason last time I wrote this as favourite instead of favorite.

[1] 'Moonballs baroque with ornate spin…'

[2] Love this video

(Found via the FABRIC newsletter.)

I find it curious that so many of your favourite things are textbooks or original scientific and mathematical texts. While I've learned a lot from textbooks, I wouldn't say that I'm emotionally attached to them the way I am to my favourite novels or memoirs. If you write another of these posts, I'd be interested to hear whether you are particularly attached to the specific presentation of these ideas or just the ideas themselves.

PS I'm sceptical of Scott Aaronson on the philosophical importance of computational complexity. While I adore Aaronson, it felt like a lot of the paper was just providing intuition pumps. The single piece that felt most clarifying to me – that the Chinese room is underspecified unless we know whether its response times scale in polynomial time – is not original to him (Kripke maybe?).